
According to ANJA NGWO Simon (2007:146), “If a student misbehaves, the teacher should accept the student and not his behaviour.” But the reality in schools proves that learners are somehow rejected because of their errors. This automatically affects their education, just like their misconduct also constitutes an obstacle to their mates’ education. Violence being one of the most frequent misbehaviours, it goes without saying that it is a hindrance to quality education. This article is aimed at bringing out some of the obstacles to quality education due to violence in the school milieu.
The
quality of our society depends on the quality of education we give to our
youths. BANFEGHA NGALIM Valentine (2014:18) points it out clearly when he says
that “We define our society and the society of our future by how and why we
educate our young.” This definitely concerns all the youths for whom the policy
of education is defined. Consequently, once a single learner is excluded in one
way or the other for one reason or the other, it affects the individual in
particular and the whole society in general. This implies that when a learner
is discriminated upon because of his violent behaviour, it renders his complete
and quality education if not impossible, at least very difficult. It also
jeopardises the future of our society.
One of
the main purposes of education is to make learners succeed in life. “Schools
exist to help children succeed”, says YONGHO N. Nichodemus (2008:96). But
violence from a learner can stop this mission. Students accused of violence
often appear before the school disciplinary council and the decision taken by
the council to sanction the misconduct is often a temporal dismissal whose
duration ranges from one to eight days depending on the level of violence
perpetrated by the accused. At times, a student can even be dismissed for good
because of violence. It is obvious that those dismissals due to violence constitute
serious obstacles to quality education.
In
addition, some injuries sustained in violent situations in schools have led to
minor or major incapacities. A student who is disabled as a result of violence
definitely loses a lot as far as acquiring education is concerned.
Moreover,
it has been established that although violence from learners against educators
is not very much talked about, it is a reality in schools. A teacher who has
been violently disrespected by a student can hardly tolerate the latter in his
class. Some teachers go as far as excluding continuously from their classes
students whom they feel have been violent against them. When the school rules
prevent a teacher from singlehandedly dismissing a supposedly violent student,
the educator always figure out a way to discriminate against the latter. BAME
NSAMENANG’s assertion that “The teacher teaches in a manner that respects the
dignity and rights of all persons without prejudice” (2008:85) then becomes
unrealistic as that “legitimate” discrimination by the victim teacher is a
serious prejudice to a learner’s education.
More so,
there have been cases where serious verbal violence, bullying and other forms
of aggressions have pushed some weak students to stay away from school. Those
losses due to violence are obstacles to quality education.
It is
worth mentioning that violence from a student does not affect only his
education, but it also constitutes an obstacle to his mates’ education. As a
matter of fact, when a school becomes a violent environment, it creates fear
that hinders learning in one way or the other. It is therefore an obstacle to
quality education. Also, there have been cases where a teacher refuses to set
foot in a class because of a violent behaviour he suffered from a student of
that class.
In a
nutshell, the negative impacts of school violence on the quality of education
are many. Among other things, being dismissed due to violence, staying away
from school by fear of violence, being discriminated against as a result of
violence, being disabled because of violence are serious obstacles to quality
education.
Works cited:
ANJA NGWO Simon (2007), Management,
Teaching Practice and Principles Made Simple, Bamenda, Patron Publishing
House
BAME NSAMENANG (2008), Professionalism
and Ethics, a Generative Curriculum, Bamenda, HDCR Publications
BANFEGHA NGALIM Valentine (2014)
Critical Thinking in Education, Bamenda, Destiny Prints
YONGHO N. Nichodemus (2007), Introduction
to Philosophy of Education, Bamenda, Anoh’s Printing Service
FOKOU Leonard
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire